Green IP Core https://www.greenipcore.com/ Design With Innovation Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:10:32 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 https://www.greenipcore.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/GIC_PQO-7-100x100.png Green IP Core https://www.greenipcore.com/ 32 32 GreenIPCore signed MoU with Omspace Rocket and Exploration Pvt. Ltd. https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-signed-mou-with-omspace-rocket-and-exploration-pvt-ltd/ Thu, 22 Feb 2024 06:43:28 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=33738 The post GreenIPCore signed MoU with Omspace Rocket and Exploration Pvt. Ltd. appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]>

M o U

GreenIPCore signed MoU with Omspace Rocket and Exploration Pvt. Ltd.

"Breaking new ground! 🌟 GreenIPCore is proud to announce a groundbreaking MoU with Omspace Rokcet and Exploration Pvt. Ltd., 

Building India for next generation hightech space age by utilising GreenIPCore's highly reliable technology.

MoU is Signed Between Omspace CEO RAVINDRA RAJ BINOD MISTRI and GreenIPCore Director Avi Patel on 21st Feb 2024

Together, we're shaping the future of technology. #Innovation #MoU #ElectronicSystems #Reliability #Aerospace #india

Linkedin

The post GreenIPCore signed MoU with Omspace Rocket and Exploration Pvt. Ltd. appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> Fault Detection, A gateway to secure user experience. https://www.greenipcore.com/fault-detection-a-gateway-to-secure-user-experience/ Sun, 02 Jul 2023 20:18:57 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=33527 Ensuring a Secure User Experience: The Power of Fault Detection Methods Introduction In today’s technology-driven world, where applications and devices are ubiquitous, ensuring a seamless user experience is of paramount importance. A single fault within an application or hardware circuit can lead to disastrous consequences, ranging from minor inconveniences to

The post Fault Detection, A gateway to secure user experience. appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]>

Ensuring a Secure User Experience: The Power of Fault Detection Methods

Introduction

In today’s technology-driven world, where applications and devices are ubiquitous, ensuring a seamless user experience is of paramount importance.

A single fault within an application or hardware circuit can lead to disastrous consequences, ranging from minor inconveniences to severe security breaches.

To prevent such scenarios, fault detection methods have become an integral part of software and hardware development.

In this blog post, we will explore how fault detection methods can secure user experience, the consequences of not implementing such methods, and the benefits and drawbacks of recent fault detection techniques.

The Importance of Fault Detection

Enhancing User Experience:

Robust fault detection methods play a crucial role in providing a smooth and uninterrupted user experience. 

By identifying and rectifying faults in real-time, applications can avoid crashes, freezes, and other malfunctions that may frustrate users.

Safeguarding Data Integrity:

Faults can compromise the integrity of user data, leading to data loss or unauthorized access. 

Implementing robust fault detection methods ensures the security and privacy of sensitive information, instilling confidence in users.

Penalties of Ignoring
"Soft Errors"

User Frustration:

Without a reliable fault detection methods, users may encounter frequent application crashes, slow performance, and unexpected errors. 

This can result in frustration, dissatisfaction, and ultimately, users abandoning the application or service.

Security Vulnerabilities:

Faults that go undetected can create loopholes for cyber attackers to exploit.

Malicious actors can leverage these vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access, steal sensitive data, or execute malicious code, putting both users and organizations at risk.

User Expectations

From a user experience point of view, users expect today’s technology to handle soft errors in applications in a seamless and reliable manner.

Users have certain expectations regarding the impact of soft errors on their overall experience, which can be summarized as follows –

  1. Reliability:

    1. Users expect that the application will function reliably, even in the presence of soft errors.

    2.  

    3. They want to minimize disruptions and avoid unexpected crashes or failures caused by soft errors.

    4.  

    5. Users expect that their data and interactions with the application will remain intact and consistent.

    6.  

  2. Data Integrity:

    1. Users expect that the application will preserve the integrity of their data despite soft errors.

    2.  

    3. They want to ensure that their information, transactions, or any other data-related activities are accurate and free from corruption or loss caused by soft errors.

    4.  

  3. Performance:

    1. Users anticipate that soft errors will not significantly impact the performance of the application.

    2.  

    3. They expect the application to remain responsive, with minimal latency or slowdowns.

    4. Users do not want to experience delays or interruptions in their tasks due to soft errors.

    5.  

  4. Seamless Error Handling:

    1. Users desire a seamless and transparent error handling process.

    2.  

    3. When a soft error occurs, they expect the application to handle it gracefully without abrupt crashes or error messages that are difficult to understand.

    4.  

    5. Users appreciate clear and concise error notifications and, if possible, suggestions for resolving the issue.

    6.  

  5. Quick Recovery:

    1. In the event of a soft error, users expect a quick recovery without losing their progress or having to start over.

    2.  

    3. They want the application to automatically recover from errors, restore their previous state if applicable, and continue smoothly without inconveniencing them.

    4.  

  6. Minimal User Intervention:

    1. Users prefer that the application handles soft errors automatically, requiring minimal intervention on their part.

    2.  

    3. They expect the application to detect and resolve errors without requiring them to perform complex troubleshooting or technical actions.

    4.  

  7. Proactive Monitoring:

    1. Users appreciate when applications proactively monitor for soft errors and take preventive measures.

    2.  

    3. They expect the application to detect potential issues before they impact their experience and take necessary precautions to mitigate the effects of soft errors.

    4.  

  8. Clear Communication:

    1. Users expect transparent and clear communication from the application regarding soft errors.

    2.  

    3. They want to understand the nature of the error, its potential impact, and any actions they need to take, if applicable. 

    4.  

    5. Users appreciate informative and user-friendly error messages.

    6.  

In summary, users expect today’s technology to handle soft errors in a way that ensures reliability, data integrity, performance, and a seamless user experience. 

They desire quick recovery, minimal intervention, proactive monitoring, and clear communication regarding soft errors. Meeting these user expectations is crucial in building user trust, satisfaction, and loyalty towards the application.

GreenIPCore fault resistance solutions

The solution offered by GreenIPCore stands out as a different and highly reliable option compared to other available hardware techniques, providing significant benefits to improve user experience and increase the market size of different sectors seeking fault-resistant semiconductor solutions.

Let’s explore these differentiators and their impact:

  1. Enhanced Reliability:

    1. GreenIPCore prioritizes fault resistance, ensuring that the semiconductor components are designed to withstand and mitigate various fault conditions.

    2.  

    3. This enhanced reliability directly translates into improved user experience by minimizing disruptions, preventing unexpected crashes, and maintaining system stability.

    4.  

    5. Users in different sectors, such as aerospace, automotive, medical devices, and industrial applications, can rely on GreenIPCore for dependable and uninterrupted operation, thus enhancing their overall experience.

    6.  

  2. Uninterrupted Functionality:

    1. By incorporating fault detection and correction mechanisms, GreenIPCore ensures that potential faults are identified and rectified in real-time.

    2.  

    3. This proactive approach allows the semiconductor components to continue functioning seamlessly, even in the presence of faults.

    4.  

    5. Users can experience uninterrupted functionality without being affected by soft errors or other fault-related issues, resulting in a positive user experience.

    6.  

  3. Minimized Downtime:

    1. GreenIPCore’s fault-resistant design philosophy significantly reduces downtime caused by faults.

    2.  

    3. The built-in fault detection mechanisms detect faults at an early stage, triggering corrective actions.

    4.  

    5. This swift response minimizes the impact of faults and reduces the need for lengthy troubleshooting or system maintenance, thereby increasing uptime and improving user experience.

    6.  

  4. Enhanced Data Integrity:

    1. Data integrity is vital for sectors that rely on fault-resistant semiconductor solutions.

    2.  

    3. GreenIPCore ensures that critical data is protected from soft errors and other fault-induced corruptions.

    4.  

    5. By incorporating error correction techniques and fault-resistant designs, GreenIPCore maintains the integrity of data, preventing loss, corruption, or inaccurate results.

    6.  

    7. This aspect is crucial in sectors such as financial services, healthcare, and telecommunications, where data accuracy and reliability are paramount.

    8.  

  5. Sector-Specific Customization:

    1. GreenIPCore offers customization options to meet the specific requirements of different sectors.

    2.  

    3. The solution can be tailored to address the unique challenges and demands of industries such as aerospace, automotive, healthcare, and more.

    4.  

    5. This customization ensures that GreenIPCore is optimized for the intended sector, providing fault-resistant semiconductor solutions that precisely fit their needs, thus increasing market size and adoption.

    6.  

  6. Compliance with Industry Standards:

    1. GreenIPCore adheres to rigorous industry standards and certifications, ensuring its reliability and compatibility with sector-specific requirements.

    2.  

    3. Meeting these standards instills confidence in customers, enabling them to trust GreenIPCore for their fault-resistant semiconductor needs.

    4.  

    5. This compliance with industry standards enhances market acceptance and facilitates expansion into sectors where strict regulatory and safety requirements exist.

    6.  

  7. Long-Term Cost Savings:

    1. By incorporating fault-resistant designs, GreenIPCore helps reduce long-term costs associated with system failures and downtime.

    2.  

    3. The enhanced reliability and extended lifespan of components minimize the need for frequent repairs, replacements, or system upgrades.

    4.  

    5. This cost-saving advantage appeals to sectors looking to optimize their operational expenses while ensuring uninterrupted performance and user satisfaction.

    6.  

In summary, the solution offered by GreenIPCore is different and more reliable than other available hardware techniques.

It improves user experience by providing enhanced reliability, uninterrupted functionality, minimized downtime, data integrity, sector-specific customization, compliance with industry standards, and long-term cost savings.

These factors contribute to increased market size across various sectors seeking fault-resistant semiconductor solutions, as they can rely on GreenIPCore to deliver superior performance, stability, and a positive user experience.

The above figure showing failure in triple vote in different failure cases.

The Triple Vote on investigation does not seems as much reliable as it sounds in the first go.

Lets evaluate some other methods as well which are in use. Here you go –

Current
Soft Error
Detection Techniques

Runtime soft error detection techniques in hardware, such as error signaling and error correcting circuits, play a crucial role in identifying and mitigating errors. Relying on a not robust technique may result in unstable application and bad user experience. Here is a quick overview of some of most used one – 

  1. Parity Check:

    • Benefits:

      • Parity check is a simple and efficient technique to detect single-bit errors. It has low hardware overhead and is easy to implement.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • Parity check cannot correct errors, and it only detects single-bit errors.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • Parity check can fail to detect errors if multiple bits are flipped simultaneously or if an error occurs in the parity bit itself.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • Parity check is a basic technique suitable for simple systems with low error tolerance.

      • However, for more robust error detection and correction, for markets like Automotive, IoT, Industrial, Military, Aerospace, Space, Satellite and Nano Satellite applications considering GreenIPCore’s advanced fault-resistant technology is recommended.

      •  

  2. Hamming Code:

    • Benefits:

      • Hamming codes provide single-bit error detection and correction capabilities. They are relatively efficient and offer improved error correction compared to parity check.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • Hamming codes have limitations in correcting multiple errors or detecting burst errors. They require additional redundancy bits, resulting in increased overhead.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • Hamming codes can fail to correct errors if multiple bits are flipped within the same code word or if the error pattern exceeds the code’s correction capability.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • Hamming codes are suitable for applications requiring moderate error detection and correction.

      • However, for more advanced and versatile fault-resistant solutions, exploring GreenIPCore technology is advisable for markets like Automotive, IoT, Industrial, Military, Aerospace, Space, Satellite and Nano Satellite.

      • .

      •  

  3. Reed-Solomon Code:

    • Benefits:

      • Reed-Solomon codes are powerful error detection and correction codes, capable of handling multiple errors and burst errors.

      • They are widely used in storage systems and data transmission.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • Reed-Solomon codes have higher hardware and computational complexity compared to simpler error correction techniques.

      • They require additional redundancy bits and processing overhead.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • Reed-Solomon codes can fail to correct errors if the error pattern exceeds their correction capability or if errors occur in closely spaced locations.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • Reed-Solomon codes are suitable for applications requiring robust error correction.

      • However, for tailored fault-resistant solutions and optimization, GreenIPCore’s technology offers a more flexible and efficient approach.

      •  

  4. Error Correction Code (ECC):

    • Benefits:

      • ECC is a widely used error correction technique that provides efficient error detection and correction capabilities. It offers improved reliability and resilience against soft errors.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • ECC requires additional memory and computational resources, resulting in increased hardware complexity and power consumption.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • ECC can fail to correct errors if the error pattern exceeds its correction capability or if multiple errors occur within the same code word.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • ECC is suitable for applications requiring high reliability and fault tolerance.

      • GreenIPCore’s fault-resistant technology can complement ECC by offering tailored solutions and optimizations based on specific system requirements.

      •  

  5. Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR):

    • Benefits:

      • TMR provides high fault tolerance by triplicating hardware components and using voting mechanisms to detect and correct errors.

      • It offers excellent reliability and resilience against soft errors.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • TMR requires significant hardware redundancy, resulting in increased area, power consumption, and cost. It may introduce additional latency due to the voting process.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • TMR can fail if multiple errors occur simultaneously in all three redundant components or if errors are undetectable by the voting mechanism.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • TMR is suitable for critical applications demanding high fault tolerance.

      • GreenIPCore’s technology can complement TMR by providing customized fault-resistant solutions that optimize resource utilization and further enhance reliability.

      •  

  6. Dual Modular Redundancy (DMR):

    • Benefits:

      • DMR duplicates hardware components, providing improved fault tolerance compared to single instances. It offers a balance between fault tolerance and resource utilization.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • DMR provides lower fault tolerance than TMR since it has only two redundant components. It still incurs additional area and power overhead compared to single instances.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • DMR can fail if both redundant components experience errors simultaneously or if errors go undetected due to the lack of a voting mechanism.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • DMR is suitable for applications that require moderate fault tolerance.

      • GreenIPCore’s technology can further enhance fault tolerance by incorporating customized error detection and correction mechanisms.

      •  

  7. Time Redundancy:

    • Benefits:

      • Time redundancy involves executing the same task multiple times and comparing the results. It offers good error detection capabilities and can be implemented with minimal hardware overhead.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • Time redundancy can introduce additional latency and computational overhead due to redundant executions. It may not provide error correction capabilities.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • Time redundancy can fail to detect errors if all redundant executions produce the same incorrect result due to simultaneous errors or systematic faults.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • Time redundancy is suitable for applications with low error tolerance and real-time requirements.

      • GreenIPCore’s technology can complement time redundancy by providing additional error correction capabilities and fault-resistant optimizations.

      •  

  8. Watchdog Timer:

    • Benefits:

      • Watchdog timers monitor system operations and trigger a reset if errors or faults are detected. They provide a mechanism for error detection and recovery.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • Watchdog timers do not correct errors directly but rely on external mechanisms to handle errors once they are detected. They add minimal hardware overhead.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • Watchdog timers can fail to detect errors if they malfunction or if the error condition goes unnoticed due to limited monitoring capabilities.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • Watchdog timers are useful for detecting errors and initiating recovery mechanisms.

      • Combining GreenIPCore’s fault-resistant technology with watchdog timers can provide a comprehensive solution for error detection, correction, and recovery.

      •  

  9. Redundant Execution:

    • Benefits:

      • Redundant execution involves running multiple instances of the same computation and comparing the results.

      • It provides good error detection capabilities with minimal hardware overhead.

      •  

    • Drawbacks:

      • Redundant execution can introduce additional latency and computational overhead due to redundant computations. It does not inherently offer error correction capabilities.

      •  

    • Failure Conditions:

      • Redundant execution can fail to detect errors if all redundant computations produce the same incorrect result due to simultaneous errors or systematic faults.

      •  

    • Recommendation:

      • Redundant execution is suitable for applications with low error tolerance.

      • GreenIPCore’s technology can complement redundant execution by providing additional error correction mechanisms and customized fault-resistant designs.

      •  

  10. Duplicated Circuitry:

  •  

  • Benefits:

    • Duplicating circuitry involves replicating the entire hardware component or system. It provides high fault tolerance and can detect errors through output comparison.

    •  

  • Drawbacks:

    • Duplicating circuitry increases area, power consumption, and cost due to the replication of resources. It may introduce additional latency in error detection and correction.

    •  

  • Failure Conditions:

    • Duplicating circuitry can fail if all replicated components experience errors simultaneously or if errors go undetected due to the lack of comparison mechanisms.

    •  

  • Recommendation:

    • Duplicating circuitry is suitable for applications requiring high fault tolerance.

    • GreenIPCore’s technology can complement duplicated circuitry by offering customized fault-resistant designs that optimize resource utilization and further improve reliability.

    •  

In comparison to the above techniques, GreenIPCore’s technology offers several advantages:

  1. Tailored Solutions:

    1. GreenIPCore’s technology provides customized fault-resistant solutions based on specific system requirements, optimizing performance, reliability, and resource utilization.

    2.  

  2. Comprehensive Approach:

    1. GreenIPCore focuses on developing comprehensive fault detection, correction, and mitigation techniques, combining multiple strategies to achieve high reliability.

    2.  

  3. Advanced Algorithms:

    1. GreenIPCore incorporates advanced algorithms and design methodologies to enhance fault detection and correction capabilities, improving overall system reliability.

    2.  

  4. Efficiency:

    1. GreenIPCore focuses on developing efficient fault detection and correction techniques to minimize the impact on system performance, power consumption, and area overhead.

    2.  

Based on these advantages, it is recommended to consider adopting GreenIPCore’s fault-resistant technology in scenarios where high reliability, customizability, scalability, and efficiency are crucial.

The specific recommendation for each application would depend on its unique requirements, but GreenIPCore’s innovative approach to fault tolerance holds promise for improving the reliability and performance of hardware systems.

The post Fault Detection, A gateway to secure user experience. appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> GreenIPCore Incubated with FITT, IIT Delhi. https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-incubated-with-fitt-iit-delhi/ Mon, 23 May 2022 10:35:12 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=31163 IIT Delhi Entrepreneur cell AIC (FITT) started GreenIPCore Incubation. The program includes grant of fund from IITD (FITT). GreenIPCore Incubated with FITT, IIT Delhi. Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer (FITT) at IIT Delhi has been the vanguard of knowledge transfer activities from academia since its inception in 1992. This

The post GreenIPCore Incubated with FITT, IIT Delhi. appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]>

IIT Delhi Entrepreneur cell AIC (FITT) started GreenIPCore Incubation. The program includes grant of fund from IITD (FITT).

GreenIPCore Incubated with FITT, IIT Delhi.

Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer (FITT) at IIT Delhi has been the vanguard of knowledge transfer activities from academia since its inception in 1992. This techno-commercial organization from academia is counted amongst the successful such organizations. FITT provides superior program management services and is steadily increasing its operational landscape. The varied roles of FITT can be seen in enabling innovations and technopreneurship, business partnerships, technology development, consultancy, collaborative R&D, technology commercialization, development programs, corporate memberships etc. These roles are necessitated by the key agenda of the Foundation to showcase the Institute’s “intellectual ware” to industry, and thereby unlock it’s knowledgebase and inculcate industrial relevance in teaching and research at IIT Delhi.

DSIR has recognized FITT as a Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (SIRO). As a SIRO, FITT is eligible for full custom duty exemption for import of capital goods, raw materials and technology know-how that are required for execution of R&D programs sponsored by the industry.

GreenIPCore delighted to share the great level of support from the entire FITT members. GreenIPCore thanks to FITT for this giant fortunate opportunity to grow. From the day we have presented GreenIPCore till today the support from FITT is truly commendable.

Thanks to entire FITT team behalf of GreenIPCore Team.

Read Full Article on LinkedIn Here

The post GreenIPCore Incubated with FITT, IIT Delhi. appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> Autonomous Reliable Products https://www.greenipcore.com/autonomous-reliable-products/ Sun, 29 Aug 2021 16:46:40 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=30769 Examples of Reliable and Secure Chip About Transient Fault Correction IPs New-generation autonomous systems, both those that are already beginning to emerge and definitely those people are expecting, differ from existing systems in the several key aspects. These aspects, which are being now discussed, position the “New-generation”. They have a

The post Autonomous Reliable Products appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]>
Examples of
Reliable and Secure Chip
About Transient Fault Correction IPs

New-generation autonomous systems, both those that are already beginning to emerge and definitely those people are expecting, differ from existing systems in the several key aspects. These aspects, which are being now discussed, position the “New-generation”.

They have a large variety of possibly conflicting system goals.

A typical new-generation autonomous system will not be focused on a small number of well-defined goals, such as winning a game of chess, or a vehicle reaching a correct destination without collisions or reconfiguration within the course of journey.

Rather the system goals would be dynamically set and user would expect system to complete those goals with low level functions operating autonomously by the system.

Their environment is dramatically less predictable.

Even autonomous systems of the present already have to deal with an enormous number of known and unknown environment configurations, and these obviously add a whole new order of magnitude to this difficulty.

This add a much heavier overhead on software to ensure everything goes right and system is able to reach its objective. Software developers focus more towards ensuring the committed functions works right and less focus towards improve the system level of functional behavior.

They are expected to provide rich high level interaction

Classical human–computer interaction (HCI) is typically geared toward trained users or operators controlling automated tasks. New people expect to define much high level of system expected goals and system need to work autonomously on smaller activities to achieve the object.

New interfaces will have to deal with the overall behavior of the system as sensed by humans, with the way the system affects human behavior and with the way humans think about system behavior.

New-generation autonomous systems will affect and put at risk a far wider circle of people, and will be increasingly exposed to both helpful and adversarial human actions, with the required communication and interaction that they necessitate.

To deliver the types of autonomy described, passenger vehicles have transformed into semi-autonomous, connected mobile devices on wheels. Vehicle of the future will provide even more autonomous features and eventually become fully autonomous.

Autonomous vehicles will account for 15 percent of global light vehicle sales by 2030. 

New generation products include –

Autonomous robots- Autonomous robots vary from simple robot floor cleaners to complex autonomous helicopters.

Autonomous warehouse and factory systems– From mail sorting systems to material conveyors to assembly robots, a diverse array of autonomous systems performs routine and repetitive tasks, enabling better use of human efforts. On assembly lines, autonomous factory robot arms perform many heavy and precision tasks – such as arc welding, painting, finishing and packaging.

Autonomous drones- Unmanned aerial vehicles, known as UAVs or drones, are small self-piloting autonomous aircraft. Drones have long been used for reconnaissance, surveying, asset inspection and environmental studies. Two common uses for drones are agriculture and oil well inspection.

Autonomous UAV technology has its basis in the autopilot technology used by captains in commercial aircraft with very limited objective and defined paths, and has to remain available through the journey to encounter any functional issues if they occur. Fully autonomous (pilotless) passenger aviation remains a distant goal.

The Current technology is not able to serve the new need of autonomous security, stability and reliability which are coming up due to lack of reliable silicon chips. The Current Chips are not able to work continuously due to data or control logic corruption.

The need for new generation products is “rich high level user interaction with fully autonomous working”.

People expect good security, seamless continuous operation, which is a fair expectation as product are advertised like that but they actually cannot serve the feature expected out of current semiconductor chips as they corrupt and fail every now and then.

We know the technology exist but-

1. First of all, current technology is not reliable and fails quiet often.

2. Secondly, people expect much more out of it and expect completely failsafe.

To meet the requirement for the new generation markets, chips can now be made in a way that it can correct its runtime logical faults in hardware.

The corruption will not reach the software circuitry rather the GreenIPCore technology can fix all the possible faults, glitches and corruption of data and control logic in hardware. One can build reliable product with this technology and gain more stability in their semiconductor chips.

The current software developer can now move their focus from “Getting rid of fault correction by software methods” to “providing a reliable and much more feature rich, high autonomous interface and system behavior to the user” with the help of our proven “Fault Resistant and Fault Correcting Technology”.

GreenIPCore technology is well equipped with tremendous hardware improvements and capable of improving the logical hardware paths of different circuits to provide much more reliable operational excellency, without any drop in operating frequency or functions.

With the implementation of fault rejection and correction at hardware layer, the system software become much simple as it has not to worry about adding a layer of software to encounter and deal with the logical faults and its effects.

We firmly believe in the future of reliable product development as a safe and cost-effective form of transformation to rich product feature-set with a vast addressable market.

So, let’s make reliable products.

Examples of
Reliable and Secure Chip
About Transient Fault Correction IPs

Self Fault Correcting IPs, Building block of Reliable and Secure Products

Review Full IP List

Generate IP Licence Request

Get IP License
Get Demo IP
IP for University

Read more on Technology Post and Papers

Fault Detection, A gateway to secure user experience.

Autonomous Reliable Products

SOC Stability In Small Package

Fault Resilient SOC Security Infrastructure

The post Autonomous Reliable Products appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> About High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology https://www.greenipcore.com/about-high-stable-fault-resilient-technology/ https://www.greenipcore.com/about-high-stable-fault-resilient-technology/#respond Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:40:07 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=24681 The Next Big Thing is “Product Reliability” Products are Missing Reliability in their feature list. People really care about reliability of Products. This is something every one expects but since the technology is unable to provide, product developers are unable to offer. There are So Many Issues distracting the working

The post About High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]>

The Next Big Thing is “Product Reliability"

  • People really care about reliability of Products.
    • This is something every one expects but since the technology is unable to provide, product developers are unable to offer.
    • There are So Many Issues distracting the working of current electronics like Noise and designers use current electronics with different methods to achieve reliability as much as they can but unable to take guarantee on product reliability.
    • The New Products need Reliable electronics to provide stable and reliable services to users.
    • Due to unreliable electronics, lots of products are chocked and does not sell as people does not believe them and dose not use them to a extent of daily life.
    • Everyone needs reliable product despite of the usage.
    • High end products want to take full control of application but innovation on design is not blocking them to be placed to consumers. It is reliability of the products.

The Working Environment of Electronic Products

Following are some of the different type of Hazards which distract Electronic Circuits –

  • Ambient Noise
  • Power Quality Degradation Noise
  • High Power Noise
  • Railroad and Mass Transit Noise
  • Medical equipment Generated Noise

Ambient Noise/ Ambient EME is composed of numerous sources of which the most significant are –

  • Television transmissions
  • Solar Magnetic Storms which peak on a eleven year cycle.
  • Lightning which occurs as a very high voltage and high current event
  • Utility power grid transmission lines.
  • Other ambient EME sources include airport radar, telecom transmissions, electrostatic discharge (ESD), and white noise.
  • Some other major product and systems as emissions sources include switching mode power supplies, arc welders, motor bushes and electrical contacts.

Effect of Ambient Noise/ Ambient EME – 

  • It can affect sensitive electronic equipment Internal Voltage and Line Voltages.
  • In the case of the effects of ESD on sensitive electronic systems, it can cause upsets, burn outs, and latch-ups in these units.

Power Quality degradation factors can affect the operation of equipment that is powered by a mains power source. These mains degradation factors include:

  • Voltage surges, sages, dips, spikes, and high and low voltage
  • Brownouts and blackouts
  • Power line faults
  • Electrical Fast Transitions (EFT)

Effect of Power Quality degradation Noise – 

  • Power Quality distortions and transient that are present on the power main systems can affect the normal operation of the equipment to that it supplies power.
  • Transits such as power surges are capable of destroying interface electronic circuits. EFTs can cause electronic circuit upset conditions.

High Powered Electromagnetic Pulses threats which are intended to disable electrical and electronic equipment.

Currently, existing HEMP devices include the following:

  • High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP)
  • High Powered Microwave (HPM)
  • Intentional Electromagnetic Interference (IEMI) source

Effect of High Powered Electromagnetic Pulses – 

  • High powered electromagnetic sources can totally destroy an electrical and electronic equipment’s function.
  • High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) is a near-instantaneous electromagnetic energy field that is produced in the atmosphere by the power and radiation of a nuclear explosion, and that is damaging to electronic equipment over a very wide area, depending on power of the nuclear device and altitude of the burst.
  • High-Power Microwave (HPM) electromagnetic energy can be produced as a near-instantaneous pulse created through special electrical equipment that transforms battery power, or powerful chemical reaction or explosion, into intense microwaves that are also very damaging to electronics, but within a much smaller area.

Railroad and Mass Transit Systems have some unique types of EMI source problems. These include:

  • Train signaling systems and their associate Computer operating codes.
  • Third rail shoes arcing broadband emissions
  • Train control system’s emissions.

Effect of Railroad and Mass Transit Systems Noise – 

Railroad and Mass Transit Systems have one primary source of EMI and that is the transit and railroad engine’s propulsion systems, which operates with high voltages, currents, and magnetic field levels.

  • They have been known to affect other facilities that contain sensitive electrical equipment that are located near the railroad or mass transit systems right away.
  • These propulsion systems have had EMI associated problems with other elements of their systems.
  • Train control electronics can be affected by EMI sources such as third rail and other broadband frequency arcing sources if they are not adequate designed for EMC.

Medical equipment utilized in medical facilities has numerous EMI sources. Some of the more prominent of these are listed below:

  • Life support equipment such as ventilators, cardiac defibrillators, infusion pumps, etc.
  • Patient telemetry and assistance equipment which includes electrocardiographs and motorized wheelchairs.
  • Electrical surgical units and their associated support equipment.
  • Magnetic Resonance Imagine (MRIs) system.
  • X-ray units, both therapeutic and diagnostic
  • Gamma Beam Electron Accelerators and Therapeutic equipment

Effect of Medical Equipment Generated Noise – 

  • Medical equipment and facilities sources include patient monitoring systems
  • Those are very susceptible to EMI interactions.
  • The human body signals that they monitor are very weak.
  • They are measured in unites of microvolts and micro-amps.
  • Among other devices that are susceptible to EMI are hearing aids, wireless patient monitoring systems, magnetic resonance imaging systems, implantable cardiovascular devices, drug pumps, and portable diagnostic meters.
  • As new technologies are developed and enter the marketplace at a fast pace the list will grow.

GreenIPCore Robust, Stable and Reliable Technology.

GreenIPCore High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology Innovation

To Give you feel of technological innovation we present, Please look into the Video Presentation of technology Comparison we present to you.

High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology Live Video Demonstration
Download Fault Resilient Demonstration Code to Evaluate

Presenting High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology for your products

GreenIPCore Presents Fault Resilient Soft Digital IPs for SOC’s and Fault Resilient Soft Digital Security IPs for Security infrastructure used inside Secure SOC’s. We also Offer Development of Custom IP Development as per your application needs. Please look into our Portfolio IPs for more details into it.

High Stable, Fault Resilient Products and Improvements

Some Conventional, Not Much Reliable, Methods

Below are methods used to isolate circuits, identify errors and keep them running bug free but none of them is able to guarantee the application reliability and provide dependent electronic products.

  • Some External protection Methods –
    • Metal Shields
    • Coating Paint
  • Some Internal Chip methods –
    • Lock Step –  Detects Error but generate chip wide reset.
    • Triple Vote, Multi Vote, De-bounce etc in Hardware –  Increases gate count a lot, still application misbehaves.
  • Software methods
    • Software Redundancy
  • Physical Library Methods.
    • Redundancy implanted in Physical Library.

Still with all these methods, the application stability and reliability is not guaranteed.

Some Current External Protection Methods –

Metal Shield is good option but Noise can enter from different other paths like – 

  • Power Lines.
  • Connection Lines.
  • Temperature sudden variations
  • Cannot be Complete “Faraday Cage” as there are lots of inputs coming from outside carry Different kind of Noise Signals.

Not all kind of Noise travel from metal paths. Noise from – 

  • Magnetic Sources like magnetic couplings and resonance can generate currents in remote wires entangled.
  • Not all type of Radiation be blocked by shields.

This all makes a possibility of failure in product randomly.

Another non relevant drawback is increase in weight.

Heavy Metal Paint is good option but Noise can enter from different other paths like – 

  • Power Lines.
  • Connection Lines.
  • Temperature sudden variations
  • Cannot be Complete farad cage as there is always space open from substrate within the boards.
  • Magnetic Sources like magnetic couplings and resonance can generate currents in remote wires entangled.
  • Not all type of Radiation be blocked by Heavy metal Paint shields.

This all makes a possibility of failure in product randomly.

Another Non Relevant Drawback is Very Costly Paints, can effect product price.

Some Current Internal Protection Methods –

Lock Step Method uses two core of the same type working in parallel all the time, having same inputs and compares all the outputs. This method is good to identify a error in operation of logic but It has following issues – 

  • It cannot fix the Error.
  • The only reaction system has for lockstep error is reset the complete chip.
  • Application working on this is highly suspected to have resets incase there is any corruption.
  • Realtime applications like Automotive, Aerospace, Drone etc.. should not be built using this as the chip can reset at any wrong time.
  • New Application like Autonomous engineering, Autonomous Driving etc should not be build using this as they need to be functional and working perfect all the times.

Another Non Relevant but important Drawback is this method doubles the gate count and double the power.

Triple vote, Multi-Vote, De-Bounce, ECC, Parity and other minor logic used today are not able to develop a reliable product.

These methods are applied on boundary, interfaces and some portion of Application but the entire Application is built of functional logic inside and noise can effect any logic not just periphery.

End-to-End ECC is able to protect Data and control flowing from one IP to another and stored data in memory but cannot protect against Logic. Also, the protected bits are so less in this method that this protection does not able to resist against Electromagnetic Noise and Other environmental hazards.

These methods gives very minor protection and Complete application and product working remain Unreliable.

Another Non Relevant but important Drawback is this method gate count and the dynamic/ static power consumption increases a lot.

Software Methods for Stability

Software Methods

Software uses methods like

  • De-bounce implementation while reading information and status from Hardware.
  • Multi Checks for old conditions with new conditions.
  • Storing same data at multiple places.
  • Calculating Checksum, CRC and ECC for different data.

None of the Method used are able to identify if hardware itself is misbehaving and giving wrong results making software blind.

Another Non Relevant but sometime important Drawback is this method is –

  • Software execution set size increases a lot making entire application to consume more MIPS which result in
    • bulky Software Routine,
    • Large application code size,
    • increase in memory consumption size,
    • increase in Boot ROMs and Boot Images
    • Increase in Library Sizes.
  • This Make complete Product LAG and Operate Slowly.

Physical Library Methods for Stability

Physical Level Library improvements Methods

There are So many methods used on physical library like

  • Using More HVT Cells.
  • Implement redundancy like triple vote in physical library.
  • Using Overdoped Cells.
  • Balancing Physical Lines to reject Noise impacts.
  • Using logic duplication.
  • etc..

None of the Method used are able to fully guarantee the working of application and ensure that none of the Noise has pass through and impacted the hardware to misbehave.

Another Non Relevant but sometime important Drawback is this method is –

  • Need Full Custom ASIC somtime.
  • Increase in Silicon Area
  • Increase in Silicon Power.
  • Increase the Timing Paths making more use of HVT Cells which again result in continuous consumption of more Power.

  

About GreenIPCore Technologies

GreenIPCore is a leading IP Core Provider to enable Reliable Product Line.

Achievements

GreenIPCore has Proven High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology across Different Semiconductor Platforms. World-class leadership and engineering teams with expertise in Fault Resilient Technology, High Performance, Security, deep-learning and AI

Read More

Awards

GreenIPCore Selected Within TOP-Finalist in SMC Select at IITK

Read More

Technology Patent

GreenIPCore Holds 2 Patents in High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology.

  

Contact Us

Want to accelerate your project with GreenIPCore innovation? We provide Wide Range of Safety and Fail Safe IPs to enable Product for Automotive, IIOT, Security and AIML. Let us help you discover the power of our scalable and efficient technology.

Let's Connect

Partner for Early Access

At GreenIPCore, we’re always working on what’s next. Partner with us to be the first to learn more and test our next generation designs with Early Access.

Partnership Request

  

GreenIPCore, PlusQo Corp. Pvt, Ltd.

805, 8th Floor, OM Tower, Alpha Commercial Belt, Greater Noida, India, Pin: 201310

email : – start@greenipcore.com

Mobile: – +91 9821330671

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Press Release 

  

GreenIPCore

The post About High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> https://www.greenipcore.com/about-high-stable-fault-resilient-technology/feed/ 0 GreenIPCore Selected In NASSCOM. https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-selected-in-nasscom/ https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-selected-in-nasscom/#respond Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:46:54 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=22421 Dated: 25 Jan 2020 GreenIPCore Selected in NASSCOM for Kickstarting their growth at a Event organised at NASSCOM Noida.

The post GreenIPCore Selected In NASSCOM. appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> Dated: 25 Jan 2020

GreenIPCore Selected in NASSCOM for Kickstarting their growth at a Event organised at NASSCOM Noida.

The post GreenIPCore Selected In NASSCOM. appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-selected-in-nasscom/feed/ 0 GreenIPCore: IESA-Most Promising Startup of the year 2019 https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-iesa-most-promising-startup-of-the-year-2019/ Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:24:13 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=17386 IESA (India Electronics and Semiconductor Association) Awarded GreenIPCore Most Promising Startup Of the Year 2019 for Outstanding Contribution in Electronics Industry IESA Awarded “GreenIPCore” as “Most Promising Start-up” of the “Year 2019” at “Aerospace and Defence Conference” at “Taj Bangalore, India” on “Dated 19Sept2019”. The Award was presented by –

The post GreenIPCore: IESA-Most Promising Startup of the year 2019 appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]>

IESA
(India Electronics and Semiconductor Association)
Awarded
GreenIPCore
Most Promising Startup Of the Year
2019
for
Outstanding Contribution
in
Electronics Industry

IESA Awarded “GreenIPCore” as “Most Promising Start-up” of the “Year 2019” at “Aerospace and Defence Conference” at “Taj Bangalore, India” on “Dated 19Sept2019”.
The Award was presented by –
1. Honourable Minister “Dr. C. N. Ashwath Narayana”, Deputy CM & Minister Higher Education, IT BT and S&T, GoK,
2. “Dr. E. V. Ramana Reddy”, IAS, Addi. Chief Secretary, Dept of IT, BT and S&T, GoK.
And
3. “Guest of Honour H E Dana Kursh”, Consulate General, Consulate of Israel.
GreenIPCore Director Mr. Rajesh Gupta and Mr. Avi Patel has Received this Technology Award of Honor.
GreenIPCore Team thank you for all your support and looking forward for an innovative journey ahead.
#IntelligentElectronics #technology #iesa #innovation #startup #stability #electronics #spacetechnology #defence #reliabilityengineering #automotive #iotsolutions #autonomousdriving #aerospace #aerospaceengineering

The post GreenIPCore: IESA-Most Promising Startup of the year 2019 appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> BEL (Bharat Electronics Limited) Identifies GreenIPCore https://www.greenipcore.com/bel-bharat-electronics-limited-identifies-greenipcore/ https://www.greenipcore.com/bel-bharat-electronics-limited-identifies-greenipcore/#respond Thu, 08 Aug 2019 12:42:48 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=16270 GreenIPCore Identified By BEL (Bharat Electronics Limited) as Design Service Provider In technology area of IP Core Design. Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL)

The post BEL (Bharat Electronics Limited) Identifies GreenIPCore appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]>

GreenIPCore Identified By BEL (Bharat Electronics Limited) as Design Service Provider In technology area of IP Core Design.

Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL)

The post BEL (Bharat Electronics Limited) Identifies GreenIPCore appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> https://www.greenipcore.com/bel-bharat-electronics-limited-identifies-greenipcore/feed/ 0 GreenIPCore at SiFive Conference https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-at-sifive-conference/ https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-at-sifive-conference/#respond Sun, 04 Aug 2019 16:38:22 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=16182 Workshop on Configure Custom High stable RISC-V Core and Bring up on FPGA held a IIT Madras Research Park on august 3rd 2019. Also had a good time in discussing the use cases in various applications with the students of IIT, Incubate members, Faculties from various colleges, industries and Banking

The post GreenIPCore at SiFive Conference appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> Workshop on Configure Custom High stable RISC-V Core and Bring up on FPGA held a IIT Madras Research Park on august 3rd 2019.

Also had a good time in discussing the use cases in various applications with the students of IIT, Incubate members, Faculties from various colleges, industries and Banking Sectors.

The post GreenIPCore at SiFive Conference appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> https://www.greenipcore.com/greenipcore-at-sifive-conference/feed/ 0 About High Stable, Fault Correcting Technology https://www.greenipcore.com/about-high-stable-fault-resistant-technology/ https://www.greenipcore.com/about-high-stable-fault-resistant-technology/#respond Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:27:36 +0000 https://www.greenipcore.com/?p=15709 The Next Big Thing is “Product Reliability” Products are Missing Reliability in their feature list. People really care about reliability of Products. This is something every one expects but since the technology is unable to provide, product developers are unable to offer. There are So Many Issues distracting the working

The post About High Stable, Fault Correcting Technology appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]>

The Next Big Thing is “Product Reliability"

Products are Missing Reliability in their feature list.

  • People really care about reliability of Products.

    • This is something every one expects but since the technology is unable to provide, product developers are unable to offer.

    • There are So Many Issues distracting the working of current electronics like Noise and designers use current electronics with different methods to achieve reliability as much as they can but unable to take guarantee on product reliability.

    • The New Products need Reliable electronics to provide stable and reliable services to users.

    • Due to unreliable electronics, lots of products are chocked and does not sell as people does not believe them and dose not use them to a extent of daily life.

    • Everyone needs reliable product despite of the usage.

    • High end products want to take full control of application but innovation on design is not blocking them to be placed to consumers. It is reliability of the products.

The Working Environment of Electronic Products

Normal Environment is Full of Hazards and Distractions to Disturb Electronics

Following are some of the different type of Hazards which distract Electronic Circuits –

  • Ambient Noise

  • Power Quality Degradation Noise

  • High Power Noise

  • Railroad and Mass Transit Noise

  • Medical equipment Generated Noise

Normal Environment is Full of Hazards and Distractions to Disturb Electronics

Following are some of the different type of Hazards which distract Electronic Circuits –

  • Ambient Noise

  • Power Quality Degradation Noise

  • High Power Noise

  • Railroad and Mass Transit Noise

  • Medical equipment Generated Noise

Ambient Noise Sources and Effects

Ambient Noise/ Ambient EME is composed of numerous sources of which the most significant are –

  • Television transmissions

  • Solar Magnetic Storms which peak on a eleven year cycle.

  • Lightning which occurs as a very high voltage and high current event

  • Utility power grid transmission lines.

  • Other ambient EME sources include airport radar, telecom transmissions, electrostatic discharge (ESD), and white noise.

  • Some other major product and systems as emissions sources include switching mode power supplies, arc welders, motor bushes and electrical contacts.

Sun-Radiation
Welding
Transmission-Station
Lightning
High-Power-Lines

Effect of Ambient Noise/ Ambient EME – 

  • It can affect sensitive electronic equipment Internal Voltage and Line Voltages.

  • In the case of the effects of ESD on sensitive electronic systems, it can cause upsets, burn outs, and latch-ups in these units.

Power Quality Degradation Noise Sources and Effects

Power Quality degradation factors can affect the operation of equipment that is powered by a mains power source. These mains degradation factors include:

  • Voltage surges, sages, dips, spikes, and high and low voltage

  • Brownouts and blackouts

  • Power line faults

  • Electrical Fast Transitions (EFT)

Effect of Power Quality degradation Noise – 

  • Power Quality distortions and transient that are present on the power main systems can affect the normal operation of the equipment to that it supplies power.

  • Transits such as power surges are capable of destroying interface electronic circuits. EFTs can cause electronic circuit upset conditions.

High Power Noise Sources and Effects

High Powered Electromagnetic Pulses threats which are intended to disable electrical and electronic equipment.

Currently, existing HEMP devices include the following:

  • High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP)

  • High Powered Microwave (HPM)

  • Intentional Electromagnetic Interference (IEMI) source

Effect of High Powered Electromagnetic Pulses – 

  • High powered electromagnetic sources can totally destroy an electrical and electronic equipment’s function.

  • High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) is a near-instantaneous electromagnetic energy field that is produced in the atmosphere by the power and radiation of a nuclear explosion, and that is damaging to electronic equipment over a very wide area, depending on power of the nuclear device and altitude of the burst.

  • High-Power Microwave (HPM) electromagnetic energy can be produced as a near-instantaneous pulse created through special electrical equipment that transforms battery power, or powerful chemical reaction or explosion, into intense microwaves that are also very damaging to electronics, but within a much smaller area.

Railroad and Mass Transit Noise Sources and Effects

Railroad and Mass Transit Systems have some unique types of EMI source problems. These include:

  • Train signaling systems and their associate Computer operating codes.

  • Third rail shoes arcing broadband emissions

  • Train control system’s emissions.

RailRoad-2
RailRoad-1

Effect of Railroad and Mass Transit Systems Noise – 

Railroad and Mass Transit Systems have one primary source of EMI and that is the transit and railroad engine’s propulsion systems, which operates with high voltages, currents, and magnetic field levels.

  • They have been known to affect other facilities that contain sensitive electrical equipment that are located near the railroad or mass transit systems right away.

  • These propulsion systems have had EMI associated problems with other elements of their systems.

  • Train control electronics can be affected by EMI sources such as third rail and other broadband frequency arcing sources if they are not adequate designed for EMC.

Medical Equipment Generated Noise Sources and Effects

Medical equipment utilized in medical facilities has numerous EMI sources. Some of the more prominent of these are listed below:

  • Life support equipment such as ventilators, cardiac defibrillators, infusion pumps, etc.

  • Patient telemetry and assistance equipment which includes electrocardiographs and motorized wheelchairs.

  • Electrical surgical units and their associated support equipment.

  • Magnetic Resonance Imagine (MRIs) system.

  • X-ray units, both therapeutic and diagnostic

  • Gamma Beam Electron Accelerators and Therapeutic equipment

Med1
Med2

Effect of Medical Equipment Generated Noise – 

  • Medical equipment and facilities sources include patient monitoring systems

  • Those are very susceptible to EMI interactions.

  • The human body signals that they monitor are very weak.

  • They are measured in unites of microvolts and micro-amps.

  • Among other devices that are susceptible to EMI are hearing aids, wireless patient monitoring systems, magnetic resonance imaging systems, implantable cardiovascular devices, drug pumps, and portable diagnostic meters.

  • As new technologies are developed and enter the marketplace at a fast pace the list will grow.

GreenIPCore Robust, Stable and Reliable Technology.

GreenIPCore High Stable, Fault Correcting Technology Innovation

To Give you feel of technological innovation we present,
Please look into the Video Presentation
of technology Comparison we present to you.

High Stable, Fault Correcting Technology Live Video Demonstration
Download Fault Correcting Demonstration Code to Evaluate

Presenting Fault Correcting Technology

GreenIPCore Presents Fault Resilient Soft Digital IPs for SOC’s and Fault Resilient Soft Digital Security IPs for Security infrastructure used inside Secure SOC’s. We also Offer Development of Custom IP Development as per your application needs. Please look into our Portfolio IPs for more details into it.

Fault Correcting IPs for your Chip

Some Conventional, Not Much Reliable, Methods

These are some of the methods in use to stabilize the products

Below are methods used to isolate circuits, identify errors and keep them running bug free but none of them is able to guarantee the application reliability and provide dependent electronic products.

  • Some External protection Methods –

    • Metal Shields

    • Coating Paint

  • Some Internal Chip methods –

    • Lock Step –  Detects Error but generate chip wide reset.

    • Triple Vote, Multi Vote, De-bounce etc in Hardware –  Increases gate count a lot, still application misbehaves.

  • Software methods

    • Software Redundancy

  • Physical Library Methods.

    • Redundancy implanted in Physical Library.

Still with all these methods, the application stability and reliability is not guaranteed.

Some Current External Protection Methods

Metal Shields

Metal Shield is good option but Noise can enter from different other paths like – 

  • Power Lines.

  • Connection Lines.

  • Temperature sudden variations

  • Cannot be Complete “Faraday Cage” as there are lots of inputs coming from outside carry Different kind of Noise Signals.

Not all kind of Noise travel from metal paths. Noise from – 

  • Magnetic Sources like magnetic couplings and resonance can generate currents in remote wires entangled.

  • Not all type of Radiation be blocked by shields.

This all makes a possibility of failure in product randomly.

Another non relevant drawback is increase in weight.

Heavy Metal Coating Paints

Heavy Metal Paint is good option but Noise can enter from different other paths like – 

  • Power Lines.

  • Connection Lines.

  • Temperature sudden variations

  • Cannot be Complete farad cage as there is always space open from substrate within the boards.

  • Magnetic Sources like magnetic couplings and resonance can generate currents in remote wires entangled.

  • Not all type of Radiation be blocked by Heavy metal Paint shields.

This all makes a possibility of failure in product randomly.

Another Non Relevant Drawback is Very Costly Paints, can effect product price.

Some Current Internal Protection Methods

Lock Step operation for Processors and Bigger Engines

Lock Step Method uses two core of the same type working in parallel all the time, having same inputs and compares all the outputs. This method is good to identify a error in operation of logic but It has following issues – 

  • It cannot fix the Error.

  • The only reaction system has for lockstep error is reset the complete chip.

  • Application working on this is highly suspected to have resets incase there is any corruption.

  • Realtime applications like Automotive, Aerospace, Drone etc.. should not be built using this as the chip can reset at any wrong time.

  • New Application like Autonomous engineering, Autonomous Driving etc should not be build using this as they need to be functional and working perfect all the times.

Another Non Relevant but important Drawback is this method doubles the gate count and double the power.

Triple Vote, Multi Vote, De-bounce etc in Hardware

Triple vote, Multi-Vote, De-Bounce, ECC, Parity and other minor logic used today are not able to develop a reliable product.

These methods are applied on boundary, interfaces and some portion of Application but the entire Application is built of functional logic inside and noise can effect any logic not just periphery.

End-to-End ECC is able to protect Data and control flowing from one IP to another and stored data in memory but cannot protect against Logic. Also, the protected bits are so less in this method that this protection does not able to resist against Electromagnetic Noise and Other environmental hazards.

These methods gives very minor protection and Complete application and product working remain Unreliable.

Another Non Relevant but important Drawback is this method gate count and the dynamic/ static power consumption increases a lot.

Software Methods for Stability

Software Redundancy and improvements used

Software Methods

Software uses methods like

  • De-bounce implementation while reading information and status from Hardware.

  • Multi Checks for old conditions with new conditions.

  • Storing same data at multiple places.

  • Calculating Checksum, CRC and ECC for different data.

None of the Method used are able to identify if hardware itself is misbehaving and giving wrong results making software blind.

Another Non Relevant but sometime important Drawback is this method is –

  • Software execution set size increases a lot making entire application to consume more MIPS which result in

    • bulky Software Routine,

    • Large application code size,

    • increase in memory consumption size,

    • increase in Boot ROMs and Boot Images

    • Increase in Library Sizes.

  • This Make complete Product LAG and Operate Slowly.

Physical Library Methods for Stability

Physical Level Library improvements used

Physical Level Library improvements Methods

There are So many methods used on physical library like

  • Using More HVT Cells.

  • Implement redundancy like triple vote in physical library.

  • Using Overdoped Cells.

  • Balancing Physical Lines to reject Noise impacts.

  • Using logic duplication.

  • etc..

None of the Method used are able to fully guarantee the working of application and ensure that none of the Noise has pass through and impacted the hardware to misbehave.

Another Non Relevant but sometime important Drawback is this method is –

  • Need Full Custom ASIC somtime.

  • Increase in Silicon Area

  • Increase in Silicon Power.

  • Increase the Timing Paths making more use of HVT Cells which again result in continuous consumption of more Power.

  

About GreenIPCore Technologies

GreenIPCore is a leading IP Core Provider to enable Reliable Product Line.

Achievements

GreenIPCore has Proven High Stable, Fault Resilient Technology across Different Semiconductor Platforms. World-class leadership and engineering teams with expertise in Fault Resilient Technology, High Performance, Security, deep-learning and AI

Read More

Awards

GreenIPCore Selected Within
TOP-Finalist in SMC Select at IITK


Read More

Technology Patent

GreenIPCore Holds 2 Patents in High Stable,
Fault Correcting Technology
Fault Resilient Technology.

  

Contact Us

Want to accelerate your project with GreenIPCore innovation? We provide Wide Range of Safety and Fail Safe IPs to enable Product for Automotive, IIOT, Security and AIML. Let us help you discover the power of our scalable and efficient technology.

Let's Connect

Partner for Early Access

At GreenIPCore, we’re always working on what’s next. Partner with us to be the first to learn more and test our next generation designs with Early Access.


Partnership Request

  

Contact Us
Review Full IP List
Write to us
Learn More about Transient Fault Correction IPs

Generate IP Licence Request

Get IP License
Get Demo IP
Get IP License for University

GreenIPCore, PlusQo Corp. Pvt, Ltd.

805, 8th Floor, OM Tower, Alpha Commercial Belt, Greater Noida, India, Pin: 201310

email : – start@greenipcore.com

Mobile: – +91 9821330671

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Press Release 

Follow us here

Facebook Twitter Youtube

GreenIPCore

©Copyright ™GreenIPCore, All right reserved.
™GreenIPCore is the registered trademark of ®PlusQO Corporation Private Limited, India.

The post About High Stable, Fault Correcting Technology appeared first on Green IP Core.

]]> https://www.greenipcore.com/about-high-stable-fault-resistant-technology/feed/ 0